Tukkada
-
- Posts: 16873
- Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30
VKRaman,
Though not an expert, I can tell you that in CM, it has come to mean the lighter pieces of rendition in the latter part of the concert. TukDA in Hindi (Urdu) means--a little piece. In CM it encompasses songs, vituttams, jAvaLis, padams and tillAnAs which are not presented like any mains sung earlier in the concert, though a sketch of a rAgA might precede a tukkaDA piece.
I am curious though as to why you typed the question about TukDAs (small stuff) in bold letters
Though not an expert, I can tell you that in CM, it has come to mean the lighter pieces of rendition in the latter part of the concert. TukDA in Hindi (Urdu) means--a little piece. In CM it encompasses songs, vituttams, jAvaLis, padams and tillAnAs which are not presented like any mains sung earlier in the concert, though a sketch of a rAgA might precede a tukkaDA piece.
I am curious though as to why you typed the question about TukDAs (small stuff) in bold letters

Last edited by arasi on 02 Aug 2008, 06:46, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 872
- Joined: 20 May 2007, 18:45
Most of the tukkadas are in praise of god / goddesses.. Like thirupugazh, viruttam (slokas are used generally), and even in tillAnAs, charanam is on praising a god. padam / javali might not be focusing on devotion always. Bhajas certainly focus on bakthi. I am not sure how many tukkadas were sung pre-ariyakudi era, but Ariyakudi set this pattern, to give a wholesome concert for 2-1/2 hours duration catering to everyone's needs. One is free to perform a concert without a tukkada!!! Can end the concert with a grand piece like akshyalinga vibo or mari mari ninne... Only thing, it might look like eating curd rice first, and then sambar in the end(;- Don't we do this also for certain diseases like ulser? Nothing is wrong, it is all based on artist and audience chemistry and expectations.
-hari
-hari
-
- Posts: 2056
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 07:12
-
- Posts: 1896
- Joined: 28 Sep 2006, 02:15
-
- Posts: 9472
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 02:03
No, I don't think so either!
Whilst it may be a shorter piece, lighter in melody, it is still classical music.
I'd say, for instance, that a slokam, unless it appreciated purely for its religious content, is highly unlikely to be liked by someone who doesn't have a taste for carnatic music, and the improvised aspects of it.
There is also the fact that, to have reached this stage, the audience member will have had to sit through all the heavier aspects of the concert first.
Good concert presentation seems to be a skill in itself, and part of that skill is gauging the weight required at any one point. Thus the concert can be experienced as a whole, rather than as disjointed items, and one can leave feeling the completeness of the experience.
It is not simply a matter of working up to a hight, and then letting down gently with lighter stuff, although it can be and that is one way of doing it. The curve is not always regular, either: a light song in the middle refreshes the palette nicely, and is often there in the earlier part of a concert, after a certain seriousness has been achieved, and before moving on to the major item.
As Hari has said: Nothing is wrong, it is all based on artist and audience chemistry and expectations.
Whilst it may be a shorter piece, lighter in melody, it is still classical music.
I'd say, for instance, that a slokam, unless it appreciated purely for its religious content, is highly unlikely to be liked by someone who doesn't have a taste for carnatic music, and the improvised aspects of it.
There is also the fact that, to have reached this stage, the audience member will have had to sit through all the heavier aspects of the concert first.
Good concert presentation seems to be a skill in itself, and part of that skill is gauging the weight required at any one point. Thus the concert can be experienced as a whole, rather than as disjointed items, and one can leave feeling the completeness of the experience.
It is not simply a matter of working up to a hight, and then letting down gently with lighter stuff, although it can be and that is one way of doing it. The curve is not always regular, either: a light song in the middle refreshes the palette nicely, and is often there in the earlier part of a concert, after a certain seriousness has been achieved, and before moving on to the major item.
As Hari has said: Nothing is wrong, it is all based on artist and audience chemistry and expectations.
-
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: 05 Jul 2007, 18:17
Smt. Sowmya sang a full length concert of tukkadas a few years ago for Jaya TV's Margazhi Mahotsavam. At that time she mentioned, I am paraphrasing, that tukkadas are often times quite challenging to render - with a sore throat it is possible to sing the "heavy" pieces and get away using the "gnanam", but that is not possible with tukkadas.
-
- Posts: 1896
- Joined: 28 Sep 2006, 02:15
One definition-of-sorts is given here:VK RAMAN wrote:We all have some time or other used the word tukkada or tukkadas. I like to ask the learned rasikas and musicians, what, according to them, is the definition of tukkadas?
http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Car ... id/1298512
Tukkada
After a heavy dose of musically complex keerthanas the artists perform short, light and usually fast numbers. The recent trend has been that some of these are based on Hindustani Ragas. tillanas and Javalis are sung during this phase. There would roughly be around 3 to 5 tukkadas.
-
- Posts: 1896
- Joined: 28 Sep 2006, 02:15