Rsachi wrote:
...an unfogettable candle-light mikeless concert experience.
A lady was rather cross about the whole situation...
Ramakrishnan Murthy is great.
And I LOVE mic-less concerts. 90% of mine are that way. (Most of the time the mic you see is for recording only, not live sound augmentation.) And 100% of the 400+ concerts I hosted through the Sangati Center 2006 - 2014 were strictly acoustic. "Sangati Center concerts are distinguished by being presented strictly acoustically, with nothing amplified or plugged in, and with humans rather than electricity being responsible for the sound - recalling an age-old approach wherein musicianship retains the focus in lieu of elaborate production. "
Speaking of cross ladies, one time a lady requested a refund of the ticket price at one of my concerts, which had taken place in a beautiful botanical gardens, because her being able to understand the words prevented her from zoning out, which presumably it had been her intention to do.
In other words I taxed her brain too much.
You can hear me discuss this incident in an interview on the radio -
scroll down here to #ZoneOutRefund:
http://gautamtejasganeshan.com/interviews.html
Rsachi wrote:
...with everyone and everything in the moment playing a unique role in the experience.
This is, I take it, why we call our music
samgeetham.
mahavishnu wrote:
Gautam: I sent you a message through the forum, please check your spam folder.
Can't seem to find it.
Is it supposed to show up as email, or in some inbox somewhere in the forum interface?
Maybe try using my website, or facebook or twitter or something?
mahavishnu wrote:
Very interesting article. I like your writing style.
A similar point about live and performed music was brought up in a recent interview of Vijay Iyer in the New Yorker.
Nice Vijay Iyer quote. He's a smart dude. Particularly "Music is made of us listening to each other." & "We hear the sources of the sound." All the "surround-sound" in the world cannot compensate. This is one reason why I tend to refuse "monitors" - I don't want myself or the other musicians listening to a facsimile coming from somewhere else. The other reason is to do away with stupid gesturing from the stage for more and more volume. Makes a total waste of a greater proportion of concerts than anyone seems willing to admit.
varsha wrote:HM Musicians still believe in the sacredness of the moment. That is a very fundamental issue. A Malkauns on one blob on the time frame is not the same as any other. Very difficult for someone who has grown with recordings to comprehend.
Apparently in his latter years Ali Akbar Khan would not even allow folks working on the archive of his many lessons over decades to listen to recordings of him teaching the wrong raga at the wrong hour. The story goes, he would barge into the room and claim this would lead to ill-health. Personally, I'm not very much persuaded by the strict time-of-day doctrine (and I know that's not exactly what you're saying, @varsha.)
shankarank wrote:...a 6 hour drive. My interest is CSM's gumuki...
Anyone driving 6 hours to research CSM's gumuki has a certain amount of default respect from me.
shankarank wrote:TKG... his voice was in fact worse than even this... there was barely any sound - he was barely audible.
I have had this experience as well. I organized a TKG concert in SF through the Sangati Center many years back (obviously). His voice was but a rasp. And yet, it was bona fide old school CM.
Somehow...
varsha wrote:
What better way to move back and forth in time?
A "dead" great performance is beyond compare to a "live" mediocre performance.
A recording of a "dead" great performance is beyond compare to whatever is written about dead or live recordings.
Points well taken. I, for one, love recordings. And obviously I take care to produce good recordings & films of my own concerts.
Devil's advocate says: what if the result of "caveat 2" is that we rasikas increasingly hole ourselves up with our headphones instead of participating in the musical culture at large? A kind of brain-drain, which I believe is happening. I, for one, am not attending a concert just in order to be blasted with a silk sari advertisement. So then what though - do I just sit at home listening to Ramnad Krishnan in Jamshedpur in 1964 and pining for the old days until breathe my last, meanwhile not having a stake in where things are headed?
In fact that's what I do, in part! (Well, besides practicing & singing, of course.) But I'm just questioning...
Purist wrote:The debate I should say is not 'live music vs recorded music,' which is superior etc. The emphasis Gautam placed,
I guess, was let us not be wholly immersed in recorded music and neglect or ignore 'live music.'
Correct. And furthermore, the same relation obtains with respect to mic-less concerts. The problem is when, in the average experience of the average rasika, mic-less concerts become vanishingly rare. At that point something is lost. Not that all concerts should be mic-less. (I have been VERY OFTEN mistaken for having this latter position over the years...)
- G