Pachimiriyam Adiyappa
-
- Posts: 2522
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 16:06
Just the one song, and not even a kriti at that - but a gem of rare lustre!
If we had more of his compositions, would he not rank alongside the trinity?! The only info I could glean from the net was that he was the guru (?) of Syama Sastri. What else do we know about this composer - any chance that other works might have survived the fickleness of collective human memory?
And while we are at it, can we assemble a collection of classsic Viribhonis from the great masters?
Vijay
If we had more of his compositions, would he not rank alongside the trinity?! The only info I could glean from the net was that he was the guru (?) of Syama Sastri. What else do we know about this composer - any chance that other works might have survived the fickleness of collective human memory?
And while we are at it, can we assemble a collection of classsic Viribhonis from the great masters?
Vijay
Vijay
You asked for classics and I will put up a cracker.Rather two.
Comes along with a Quiz.simple one though.

The two concerts has one artist playing different instruments in each.In the second one , he arrives in a breathtaking manner.
A True Genius.Identify him.
http://download.yousendit.com/86EF08AA79442486
http://download.yousendit.com/8247518C341DCFAC
You asked for classics and I will put up a cracker.Rather two.
Comes along with a Quiz.simple one though.

The two concerts has one artist playing different instruments in each.In the second one , he arrives in a breathtaking manner.
A True Genius.Identify him.
http://download.yousendit.com/86EF08AA79442486
http://download.yousendit.com/8247518C341DCFAC
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
After all these years(nearly 3 Centuries), "the varNa" is viribONi only. It holds its own and is a prototype and a paradigm for all varNas. There is no way a music student can NoT learn this varNa. It is like saying kOil withut any qualifiers and that would always be cidambaram/ tillai.
And the most famous of all tillAnas is the jhunjhUTi tillAna of vINe SEShaNNa- diranA tana dhImta. Is it just a coincidence that these master composers belong to the same lineage! One wonders.
And the most famous of all tillAnas is the jhunjhUTi tillAna of vINe SEShaNNa- diranA tana dhImta. Is it just a coincidence that these master composers belong to the same lineage! One wonders.
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
-
- Posts: 3326
- Joined: 21 May 2005, 13:57
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
-
- Posts: 2522
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 16:06
Thanks for sharing, everyone. I second Doc's request for a recording/notation of the Kamavardhini Varnam.
Regarding Coolji's quiz - it has to be the one playing the mrudanga in the second one - absolutely fantastic. Who could it be...and which other instrument in the first one - I can't make out a Kanjira/Ghatam...a violinist/mrudangist? Improbable.... TVG was known to be a vocalist - did he play the violin as well? Or was he playing the drone? End the suspense please...A very fast paced Viribhoni for MDR!
Interesting to note the observation on D2/D1 in Bhairavi - is that really the case - was there a perceptible increase in usage of D2 by the trinity? I've heard that some people actually place Chetulara under Kharaharapriya Mela....be that as it may, I prefer the Viribhoni version any day. Maybe Doc and other experts could give us an overview of the important phrases and gamakas that bring out the raga bhava in Viribhoni - I myself never managed to grasp the "D1 P D2 N2 D1 N2 S' R2 S' phrase in the second swara passage...but it is quite beautiful to hear...
Vijay
Regarding Coolji's quiz - it has to be the one playing the mrudanga in the second one - absolutely fantastic. Who could it be...and which other instrument in the first one - I can't make out a Kanjira/Ghatam...a violinist/mrudangist? Improbable.... TVG was known to be a vocalist - did he play the violin as well? Or was he playing the drone? End the suspense please...A very fast paced Viribhoni for MDR!
Interesting to note the observation on D2/D1 in Bhairavi - is that really the case - was there a perceptible increase in usage of D2 by the trinity? I've heard that some people actually place Chetulara under Kharaharapriya Mela....be that as it may, I prefer the Viribhoni version any day. Maybe Doc and other experts could give us an overview of the important phrases and gamakas that bring out the raga bhava in Viribhoni - I myself never managed to grasp the "D1 P D2 N2 D1 N2 S' R2 S' phrase in the second swara passage...but it is quite beautiful to hear...
Vijay
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: 21 Aug 2006, 21:25
coolji,, you are right on both counts. By the way just for your info, the great SRJ was absolutely happy over the 2 tracks, and the Kanjira entry.. He was saying, the cross rhythm appearing from the kanjira was marvellous. He was thanking you for giving him some great music. I too thank you once again.
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: 18 Sep 2006, 11:13
Coolkarniji:
The first clip is by MDR-LGJ-PMI (Mrdangam)
The second is KVN-LGJ-Rajamani (Mrdangam) – PMI (Khanjira) – I have come across this as listed from the England tour of 1965.
___
On Adiappayya, another composition that he is said to have given music to is the useni svarajati E manda. The SSP mentions that the sAhityam for this piece is said to have been composed by Merattur Venkatarama Sastri.
____
On the dhaivatam of bhairavi, the traditional view is that unless the dhaivatam acts as a bridge until the ShaDjam or higher, the lower degree of dhaivatam, d1 should be used. E.g. p d1 n d1 p and p d2 n s.
The Sangeeta Sampradaya Pradarshini (SSP) mentions that the “pancas’ruti dhaivatamâ€
The first clip is by MDR-LGJ-PMI (Mrdangam)
The second is KVN-LGJ-Rajamani (Mrdangam) – PMI (Khanjira) – I have come across this as listed from the England tour of 1965.
___
On Adiappayya, another composition that he is said to have given music to is the useni svarajati E manda. The SSP mentions that the sAhityam for this piece is said to have been composed by Merattur Venkatarama Sastri.
____
On the dhaivatam of bhairavi, the traditional view is that unless the dhaivatam acts as a bridge until the ShaDjam or higher, the lower degree of dhaivatam, d1 should be used. E.g. p d1 n d1 p and p d2 n s.
The Sangeeta Sampradaya Pradarshini (SSP) mentions that the “pancas’ruti dhaivatamâ€
Last edited by sr_iyer on 12 Jan 2007, 13:10, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
to further clarify what vijay says: Basically D2 when ascending from da (to da doesnt mean anything), but D2 if descending from da (again to da doesnt mean anything). So d n e.g. as p d n would be D2, but p d p would be D1, n d p would be D1 etc etc.
This may seem like repating the obvious but before I knew more, at least i was confused about what exactly is meant by ascent/descent and thought why pa da wouldnt qualify as ascent and use D2
(or why d n d was allowed in kAmbhOji since arohana as p d s).
I may have been in the minority although i did know a few others who were similarly confused about interpreting arohana/avarona. All of us with no learning experience of course. This may seem silly to most people
Arun
This may seem like repating the obvious but before I knew more, at least i was confused about what exactly is meant by ascent/descent and thought why pa da wouldnt qualify as ascent and use D2

I may have been in the minority although i did know a few others who were similarly confused about interpreting arohana/avarona. All of us with no learning experience of course. This may seem silly to most people

Arun
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: 02 Dec 2006, 23:22
I agree arunk.
"NND1-D1D1P-PM-ND1NPD1NMPD2NS*R*NS*..." phrase is the most beautiful demo of the usage of Dha1 in the Bhairavi varnam.
It brought back nostaligic memories when I read this post.
Sri. TM Thyagarajan once demonstrated the usage of dhaivatham in Bhairavi varnam. He had a few of us, his sishyas, demo it. The most common paatandharam uses dha2 in the aarohanam liberally - but as arunk pointed out - the rule is: if the prayogam extends to the Shatjam, the dhaivatham is dha2 - otherwise it is always dha1. Any prayogam that extends upto nishadham and wraps back without touching shatjam would use dha1.
Here is an example in the chittaiswaram: (shows how both nishadhams are used)
|mmpp d1d1nn ppp d2d2d2 nnn ssr|
"NND1-D1D1P-PM-ND1NPD1NMPD2NS*R*NS*..." phrase is the most beautiful demo of the usage of Dha1 in the Bhairavi varnam.
It brought back nostaligic memories when I read this post.
Sri. TM Thyagarajan once demonstrated the usage of dhaivatham in Bhairavi varnam. He had a few of us, his sishyas, demo it. The most common paatandharam uses dha2 in the aarohanam liberally - but as arunk pointed out - the rule is: if the prayogam extends to the Shatjam, the dhaivatham is dha2 - otherwise it is always dha1. Any prayogam that extends upto nishadham and wraps back without touching shatjam would use dha1.
Here is an example in the chittaiswaram: (shows how both nishadhams are used)
|mmpp d1d1nn ppp d2d2d2 nnn ssr|
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
mishram,

In the bhaivari gItam does p d2 n2 n2 d1 p come? I thought p d n would employ d2 whether or not sa follows ni - like here.
Also I am confused why it is p d1 n m in the phrase above
Arun
I guess I am still confusedmishram wrote:"NND1-D1D1P-PM-ND1NPD1NMPD2NS*R*NS*..."
the rule is: if the prayogam extends to the Shatjam, the dhaivatham is dha2 - otherwise it is always dha1.

In the bhaivari gItam does p d2 n2 n2 d1 p come? I thought p d n would employ d2 whether or not sa follows ni - like here.
Also I am confused why it is p d1 n m in the phrase above
Arun
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: 16 Feb 2007, 23:06
Bhairavi has two dhaivata prayogams
In the ascending order, it is s g r m p d(2) n s, the descending order has s n d(1) p m g r s. However the old school view is that the D2 should not be sung as sharp and it is more of trisruti and not chatusruti dhaivatam.
Whilst in use, srgm can be permitted ocassionally only. After you land on the shadjam ( keezh shadjam), u can use m g r s, as in s m g r g. This prayogam comes in the 3rd swara of the varnam which is not sung by anybody else except by the Mudicondan school ( R Vedavalli and we, her students). There are in all four shitta swaas for the varnam asagainst three which are being sung popularly.
The 3rd which is not in vogue, is a swara passage, which starts at the lower octave as in (p d n s...) sung in the lower octave and winds with many unusual Bhairavi phrases, many unheard of slightly difficult to sing and remember. Maybe this could be one reason that it has become extinct.
One other interesting facet is that an anubandam is sung after the 4th swara, which is a long passage of sahitya which goes and joins Sri Rajagopala in the anupallavi. Again it is only sung by R V's school. Reference for this is available in SSP.
In the ascending order, it is s g r m p d(2) n s, the descending order has s n d(1) p m g r s. However the old school view is that the D2 should not be sung as sharp and it is more of trisruti and not chatusruti dhaivatam.
Whilst in use, srgm can be permitted ocassionally only. After you land on the shadjam ( keezh shadjam), u can use m g r s, as in s m g r g. This prayogam comes in the 3rd swara of the varnam which is not sung by anybody else except by the Mudicondan school ( R Vedavalli and we, her students). There are in all four shitta swaas for the varnam asagainst three which are being sung popularly.
The 3rd which is not in vogue, is a swara passage, which starts at the lower octave as in (p d n s...) sung in the lower octave and winds with many unusual Bhairavi phrases, many unheard of slightly difficult to sing and remember. Maybe this could be one reason that it has become extinct.
One other interesting facet is that an anubandam is sung after the 4th swara, which is a long passage of sahitya which goes and joins Sri Rajagopala in the anupallavi. Again it is only sung by R V's school. Reference for this is available in SSP.
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: 02 Dec 2006, 23:22
>>In the bhaivari gItam does p d2 n2 n2 d1 p come? I thought p d n would employ d2 whether or not sa follows ni - like here. <<
arunk - technically, it should be p d1 n n d1 pa. It would have been p d2 n n S only if the prayogam extended to Mel Shatjam.
>>Also I am confused why it is p d1 n m in the phrase above<<
Again, this winds down and does not touch the shatjam and hence d1 is used.
arunk - technically, it should be p d1 n n d1 pa. It would have been p d2 n n S only if the prayogam extended to Mel Shatjam.
>>Also I am confused why it is p d1 n m in the phrase above<<
Again, this winds down and does not touch the shatjam and hence d1 is used.
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
mishram,
there must be different interpretations. I was taught as p D2 n n d1 only for the gItam. I also see the same at http://www.ecse.rpi.edu/Homepages/shivk ... eetham.htm, and so others follow the same interpretation too. I havent learned the varnam (not there yet
).
Arun
there must be different interpretations. I was taught as p D2 n n d1 only for the gItam. I also see the same at http://www.ecse.rpi.edu/Homepages/shivk ... eetham.htm, and so others follow the same interpretation too. I havent learned the varnam (not there yet

Arun
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
i do see a reference in another thread http://rasikas.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=32739 (last post on that page) that the traditional interpretation conforms to what you are saying i.e. D2 when reaching mel-sa.
Arun
Arun
Last edited by arunk on 17 Feb 2007, 11:25, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 17:51
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: 30 Nov 2005, 23:33
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: 14 Oct 2005, 17:38
What is SSP please?prashant wrote:There is yet another swara passage for this varNam which very few musicians sing. It's available in the SSP.
Is it
pa da ni sa ri ga ma ga ri sa ni da pa ma
ga ri sa ni da pa ma pa da ni sa ri ga ma
ni sa ri ga ma ni da ma ga ga .....
(vaguely remember this... but I am not good in writing notations anyway)
Last edited by kaumaaram on 09 Apr 2007, 16:07, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 08:46
bala,
my version of the varnam book by panchapakesa iyer does notate the second ethugada swara passage beginning from "da ni ni da da".
ofcourse the Sangeetha Sampradaya Pradarshini (SSP) mentions an additional passage and infact gives two versions to that - one for novices and the other for experts!!!
my version of the varnam book by panchapakesa iyer does notate the second ethugada swara passage beginning from "da ni ni da da".
ofcourse the Sangeetha Sampradaya Pradarshini (SSP) mentions an additional passage and infact gives two versions to that - one for novices and the other for experts!!!
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 01 Dec 2006, 12:09
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 23:48
Is this perhaps the anubandha sAhitya that follows "cirunavvumOmuna"?gravikiran wrote:bala,
my version of the varnam book by panchapakesa iyer does notate the second ethugada swara passage beginning from "da ni ni da da".
ofcourse the Sangeetha Sampradaya Pradarshini (SSP) mentions an additional passage and infact gives two versions to that - one for novices and the other for experts!!!
Ashwin
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 10:50
no! this is the third of 4 eTTugada svarams metioned in the Pradarshini. The Anubanda sAhitya is after the 4th (actually, but the one sung as 3rd these days) eTTugada svaram.Ashwin wrote:Is this perhaps the anubandha sAhitya that follows "cirunavvumOmuna"?gravikiran wrote:bala,
my version of the varnam book by panchapakesa iyer does notate the second ethugada swara passage beginning from "da ni ni da da".
ofcourse the Sangeetha Sampradaya Pradarshini (SSP) mentions an additional passage and infact gives two versions to that - one for novices and the other for experts!!!
Ashwin
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 10:50
this second one 'D NNDDnDDM' is indeed present in the Panchapakesa iyer book. Only the third one which begins as 'p d n s' doesnt exist in his book.bala wrote:I would be grateful if someone gives Virboni varnams 2nd chittisvaras(after chiru novvu mo....).
The first is "MP G,,-R S-n, D,P...."
The third one is "S,RG SRG, R,,,, N,SR,,,,,,"
I want the second one which is not in the Panchapakesar iyer book. MS sings as |DNND DnDDm,,,,,|
Thanks
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 23:48
Oh ok I see - I think there is a similar situation with vanajAkShi ninnEkOri, the kalyANi aTa tALa varNam...I have learned an additional eTTugada svaram (as the third svara) which is in the SSP: NDD,MGRR,MGRND...
Ashwin
Ashwin
Last edited by Ashwin on 10 Apr 2007, 20:43, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: 30 Jun 2006, 03:08
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/fr/2006/0 ... 760500.htm
I would be interested in understanding a bit more on this topic. Learned readers' comments welcome.On `Viriboni' varnam
This is with reference to the review of a recital by Mohan Santhanam, `Gets the right perspective,' in these columns on June 9. The writer, Lalithaa Krishnan had mentioned that Mohan sang the Ata tala varnam `Viriboni' in Bhairavi. A reference was made to an additional third swaram in the charanam that he sang attributing it to Sangita Kalanidhi Mudicondan Venkatarama Iyer.
I wish to clarify certain facts here. The Telugu text of Subbarama Dikshitar's ``Sangita Sampradaya Pradarshini" was translated into Tamil by Dr. S. Ramanathan under the guidance and supervision of my guru Mudicondan Sri Venkata Rama Iyer and T.L Venkata Rama Iyer. This was brought out by the Music Academy in 1968. The Bhairavi Varnam is given in the book with four swarams in the charanam and an anubandham. I have learnt it that way from my guru, not because he composed the additional swaram but because that is the way it is given in the original Telugu ``Sangita Sampradaya Pradarshini" published in 1904. I have a copy of the book in Telugu for reference.
A lot of musicians today sing the varnam with only three swarams in the charanam and hence the confusion. It is important that the facts are brought to the attention of the readers and the record made straight. The swaram was not a later creation of Mudicondan Venkatarama Iyer but was part of the original composition by the legendary Pachimiryam Adiyappayya.
R. Vedavalli (Musician),
Chennai.
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01