Dr. Shrikaanth K Murthy
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 21:59
Thanks Suji, Ramakriya.
Notation available at
http://www.rasikas.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=4602#p4602
Notation available at
http://www.rasikas.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=4602#p4602
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
mnsriram
your track was wonderful .feel sorry for having missed all your earlier efforts , when I did not have a good net connection.
Would love to hear those early attempts at DRS's Compositions.
Kansen , that I am, these compositions are coming to Life for me only now ,after such renderings .Thank you so much.
your track was wonderful .feel sorry for having missed all your earlier efforts , when I did not have a good net connection.
Would love to hear those early attempts at DRS's Compositions.
Kansen , that I am, these compositions are coming to Life for me only now ,after such renderings .Thank you so much.
-
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: 09 Feb 2006, 00:04
http://www.rogepost.com/n/2702804997
Here's my attempt of ranjani varNa. Appreciate your feedback.
Tried my best to nail M2 as much as possible. Recorded it after a sumptuous meal of bisibelebath on New Year Day.
This is recorded with my ipod.
DRS, this is an improved version.
Here's my attempt of ranjani varNa. Appreciate your feedback.
Tried my best to nail M2 as much as possible. Recorded it after a sumptuous meal of bisibelebath on New Year Day.
This is recorded with my ipod.
DRS, this is an improved version.
Last edited by Suji Ram on 08 Jan 2007, 00:52, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
Suji
keep it up. Yes, the madhyama has come out better in this attempt. My mother has endorsed this too. Also, the continuity is there and the flow is much smoother. The volume is good too (both versions). You ought to have played each line of the pUrvAnga twice too. That gives better control and helps to correct mistakes the second time around.
ettugaDe pallavi- slight error. the "-dIya" (end of pUrvAnga of tALa and arudi). You must play "S,RG,S;;,". You have consistently played "SRG,". ANd in the last ettugaDe swara, first line, you have played "R;;, SN ND DM MGRSR;;," It is wrong. It should be "MGGS" only.
The gamakas have come pretty well. Good work. Congrats.
keep it up. Yes, the madhyama has come out better in this attempt. My mother has endorsed this too. Also, the continuity is there and the flow is much smoother. The volume is good too (both versions). You ought to have played each line of the pUrvAnga twice too. That gives better control and helps to correct mistakes the second time around.
ettugaDe pallavi- slight error. the "-dIya" (end of pUrvAnga of tALa and arudi). You must play "S,RG,S;;,". You have consistently played "SRG,". ANd in the last ettugaDe swara, first line, you have played "R;;, SN ND DM MGRSR;;," It is wrong. It should be "MGGS" only.
The gamakas have come pretty well. Good work. Congrats.
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 21:59
Dear Sri Kulkarni, thanks for listening. Sorry missed your post as I wasn't following the forum very regularly the last month. I will post the recordings this week.coolkarni wrote:mnsriram
your track was wonderful .feel sorry for having missed all your earlier efforts , when I did not have a good net connection.
Would love to hear those early attempts at DRS's Compositions.
Kansen , that I am, these compositions are coming to Life for me only now ,after such renderings .Thank you so much.
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
This is for some of the mac-heads in this forum.
If you have a recent imac (or a mac notebook), making a fairly good *multi-track* seems quite easy with GarageBand even with the built-in mic. Of course for amateur recordings, multi-track would mean tampura in a separate track, vocal in another for starters.
The built-in mic for imac is really really good (for a built-in mic
). Very sensitive, and also in garageband there are some built-in effects, one of which can remove most of the ambient noise which come with built-in mics.
Arun
If you have a recent imac (or a mac notebook), making a fairly good *multi-track* seems quite easy with GarageBand even with the built-in mic. Of course for amateur recordings, multi-track would mean tampura in a separate track, vocal in another for starters.
The built-in mic for imac is really really good (for a built-in mic

Arun
-
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: 09 Feb 2006, 00:04
It is one year since I registered on the Forum...
There is no better way for me to appreciate CM than to try it out myself.
I am presenting a composition of DRS which I am still learning. I am posting only the pUrvAnga in two speeds. A tough one but my favorite rAga.
DRS, please do corrections for the slower speed.
http://www.rogepost.com/n/2218277017
Also, I am posting the notations in telugu and kannada using Arun's transliterator. I added AkAram/EkAram etc to sAhitya to help me with bowing. I did spend more time making these documents than practising
Any corrections let me know
http://www.rogepost.com/n/8396879795
Feed back appreciated.
There is no better way for me to appreciate CM than to try it out myself.
I am presenting a composition of DRS which I am still learning. I am posting only the pUrvAnga in two speeds. A tough one but my favorite rAga.
DRS, please do corrections for the slower speed.
http://www.rogepost.com/n/2218277017
Also, I am posting the notations in telugu and kannada using Arun's transliterator. I added AkAram/EkAram etc to sAhitya to help me with bowing. I did spend more time making these documents than practising

Any corrections let me know
http://www.rogepost.com/n/8396879795
Feed back appreciated.
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
-
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 02:05
Suji Ram, arunk,
uploaded a pdf standalone
http://www.rogepost.com/n/9111132300
Good job
In the phrase r.. g r s n# s.. in the second line, the g is going a bit lower than required and ni is going a bit higher I think. DRS can clarify if I am correct or not.
-Ramakriya
uploaded a pdf standalone
http://www.rogepost.com/n/9111132300
Good job

-Ramakriya
Last edited by ramakriya on 09 Feb 2007, 03:34, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: 09 Feb 2006, 00:04
Here are the individual pdfs
http://www.rogepost.com/n/4636391437
http://www.rogepost.com/n/5791381018
here is the word document in English
http://www.rogepost.com/n/5062456057
I was making one in tamizh, but the letters were too big to format correctly so gave up.
http://www.rogepost.com/n/4636391437
http://www.rogepost.com/n/5791381018
here is the word document in English
http://www.rogepost.com/n/5062456057
I was making one in tamizh, but the letters were too big to format correctly so gave up.
Last edited by Suji Ram on 09 Feb 2007, 03:05, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
Suji
Good attempt. The swaras you have got ir right. The gamakas will have to be polished and that practice alone can do. Good job Suji
Notations- nice work. Some spelling mistakes though- it should be vAggEyakAra, has come as vaggeyakAra. For Dr show as "DA||" rather than as "Dar"
1st word is oraku not Oraku. 3rd line "avhALa" (The h sound shoud come in pronunciation)
Good attempt. The swaras you have got ir right. The gamakas will have to be polished and that practice alone can do. Good job Suji
Notations- nice work. Some spelling mistakes though- it should be vAggEyakAra, has come as vaggeyakAra. For Dr show as "DA||" rather than as "Dar"
1st word is oraku not Oraku. 3rd line "avhALa" (The h sound shoud come in pronunciation)
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
-
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 02:05
This is a known problem of windows xp implementation of kannada unicode, unfortunately.drshrikaanth wrote:One more thing, mUrti shows up correctly in telugu but looks like mArti in kannaDa. Maybe thats the way mU shows up? Its not strictly correct.
see the following link:
http://www.baraha.com/web_docs/unicode_issues.htm
-Ramakriya
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
that sucks. This points out one of the severe flaws in Microsoft's internationalization support - where language rules are embedded into the system. While their intent was good (they wanted every font developer not to rack his/her brains about language rules - particularly for complex scripts like Indic), but the( big) downside is you are limited by what the system can do. Bugs in system for a certain language affect every font fpr that language and you cannot make extensions for new languages (like sanketi). The irony is the font specification (open-type) is powerful enough for a font to allow it, but Microsoft's font renderer ignores it all
.
Not very good foresight.
Arun

Not very good foresight.
Arun
Last edited by arunk on 09 Feb 2007, 03:55, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
BTW, now that transl. editor is in decent shape (although malayalam needs to be completed), i should move back to the notation editor project
. Lot of work left there for even the basic version. Then need to add support for Indic scripts there. That is going to be tough (as letters within words would be split across the lyric line.
Arun

Arun
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
-
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: 09 Feb 2006, 00:04
It will be very useful. Can imagine the work it takes to get that.arunk wrote:i should move back to the notation editor project. Lot of work left there for even the basic version. Then need to add support for Indic scripts there. That is going to be tough (as letters within words would be split across the lyric line.
Arun
One line of notation-next line sAhitya- that will be tough I guess
-
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 02:05
arun
BTW, I finally tested the export to docuwiki feature
Works neat
http://www.rasikas.org/wiki/mangala
-Ramakriya
BTW, I finally tested the export to docuwiki feature
Works neat

http://www.rasikas.org/wiki/mangala
-Ramakriya
Last edited by ramakriya on 09 Feb 2007, 04:10, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: 09 Feb 2006, 00:04
Thank you for listening and feed back- DRS, Arun, Ramakriya
As for gamakas I have to practice more. I needed corrections early on, otherwise mistakes are "die hard" kind.
Now the uttarAnga..that's a tougher part. I am looking for sequences and patterns in the swaras and cannot grasp all of it. Ill have to find a way to spilt and memorize.
Now is N kaisika or kAkali
As for gamakas I have to practice more. I needed corrections early on, otherwise mistakes are "die hard" kind.
Now the uttarAnga..that's a tougher part. I am looking for sequences and patterns in the swaras and cannot grasp all of it. Ill have to find a way to spilt and memorize.
Im not sure about G.ramakriya wrote:Suji Ram,
Good jobIn the phrase r.. g r s n# s.. in the second line, the g is going a bit lower than required and ni is going a bit higher I think. DRS can clarify if I am correct or not.
-Ramakriya
Now is N kaisika or kAkali
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
Suji- I have already shown the patterns and splits. Please follow that. Dont try to split them yourself. I have shown the splits by using hyphens in the notation, as I always do.Suji Ram wrote:I am looking for sequences and patterns in the swaras and cannot grasp all of it. Ill have to find a way to spilt and memorize.
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
perhaps your browser is using previous version from cache? Do you see a choice for anuswara word endings under sanskrit tab?
Sorry for this diversion. Drs - if possible can you (or someone else) pl. post your rendition of sahana varnam (old link obviously deleted from rapidshare) and also notation pl?
Arun
Sorry for this diversion. Drs - if possible can you (or someone else) pl. post your rendition of sahana varnam (old link obviously deleted from rapidshare) and also notation pl?
Arun
Last edited by arunk on 09 Feb 2007, 04:32, edited 1 time in total.