can't see any difference between Abheri and karnataka devagandhari either. can some one explain me if there is any diference
vamshikrishna wrote:this site also quotes that dhanaashri is a janyam of natabhairavi which cannot be true as the thillana 'gita thunikku thaka' very conspicuosly employs chatusruti dhaivatham
srinidhi wrote:Aabheri of Thyagaraja = Karnataka Devagandhari of Muthuswami Dikshitar
vamshikrishna wrote:how come Kharaharapriya or natabhairavi have N2( Kakali nishadam) . to the best of my understanding it should have been N1 (kaisiki nishdam)
vamshikrishna wrote:Srinidhi wrote:Aabheri of Thyagaraja = Karnataka Devagandhari of Muthuswami Dikshitar
E.g NagumOmu e.g PanchAshaTpITa RUini
SG2 M1P N2 S SN2 D2 P M1 G2 R2 S
This would make it a derivative of Karaharapriya
The Aabheri of Muthuswami Dikshitar employs the Suddha dhaivatam in the avarohana and is classified as a janya of Natabhaivi.
vamshikrishna wrote:thanks for the explanation but i cant understand one thing how come Kharaharapriya or natabhairavi have N2( Kakali nishadam) . to the best of my understanding it should have been N1 (kaisiki nishdam)
To the best of my knowledge karnataka devagAndhAri in sampoorna mela system == devagAndhAram of asampoorna mela system.
That also means bhimplas is differerent from Abheri which is different from karnataka devagAndhAri inturn different from dhanashree.
chalanata wrote:can somebody be kind enough to post the audio clip of Nagumomu in its original form? thanks.
srinidhi wrote:Karnataka Devagandhari of Muthuswami Dikshitar e.g PanchAshaTpITa RUini
This confusion is similar to the suddhasaveri/devakriya/ karnataka suddhasaveri of the two schools.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest